My relationship with art was formed in my early childhood: nearly every week from the age of five I frequented the Hermitage Museum where I took a Lecture Programme course studying the history of art of the past. Until now prehistoric and Northern Renaissance museum rooms are my favourite places to think about new work. A strong influence also exists within my practice reflecting my classical gymnasium education: learning antique languages lead to keenness on the context of everyday objects of an ancient past, the architecture and culture that they accompanied. I try to see myself as a maker with similar sensibilities to those of craftsmen and artists of bygone eras.
I have travelled a lot through participation in residencies and symposiums in various countries, which gave me the opportunity to live for substantial amount of time in various places, where I relished the immersion into different cultures, lifestyles, and social networks, all while learning more about traditional and contemporary ceramic art. From this time, I found myself more attentive to nuances. I was thrilled by the poetry of my everyday life. At the core of my practice is subtle imagery, like the ageing of architecture where rigid things are softened with the touch of time, the antiquated objects of past that we no loner remember how to use, and uncertain rituals, preformed by unknowable participants.
In my practice I evade tacking any narrative to my work, letting myself work intuitively using my aesthetic preferences and tacit knowledge.
In my work I animate minimalist constructivist architectural forms. I seek to avoid direct, narrow, or exact images or symbols. I base my artwork on poly-cultural signs, such as architectural details, everyday and ritual objects. I come to them through research on various cultures and always bear in mind their reflection on my own reality, my everyday life. This way every artwork has a personal meaning for me, but I prefer it to be a more ambiguous experience for the viewer, leaving open the possibility of variability in the interpretation of the work.
I create visions of ageing of the architecture, where every peeling layer of surface gives a context to a history and time. In order to do so I choose purely material language of ceramics, as possible behaviours of ceramic material are very diverse. For this reason, I avoid constructing narrative projections in my work, preferring to use laconic shapes and let the nature of the material itself create its own narrative and identity that the viewer unconsciously relates to.
My latest works were inspired by a wistful longing for the post-soviet times: the subtle dilapidation of stark unadorned constructivist forms which over time have become eased and animated by their peeling layers that resemble tree bark. These soviet structures once bold and futuristic and built with uncompromising visual grammar, have through neglect and decay become lyrical.
I've situated myself on the opinion that there are a number of symbols which have made their home somewhere in the human subcortex. These images touch a viewer’s unconscious strings. That’s why I tend to present the viewer not with visually bright imagery or new unseen forms, but with what I see as these prehistoric and stable symbols clustered in laconic shapes, which sit in the back of every person’s mind. Those symbolically minimal images create a subtler relationship between the viewer and the artwork, intuitional and true.